History could prove me wrong but this is looking more and more like a WaPo fantasy.
For it to move from there, we would need those little annoying things called facts.
P
Comment by Paul — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:10 pm
What incentive would there be for the CIA to confirm the name of one of their covert operatives? That makes no sense to me.
Comment by Aaron — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:37 pm
That’s the issue, i.e., was she a covert operative, or an analyst? Not all CIA types are covert. I don’t know the answer, nor do I know who is telling the truth here–I just find the whole story odd, and if the May piece is correct, it may be that she was analyst and not a covert type.
We shall see how it all emerges.
Comment by Steven — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:56 pm
NOVAK-GATE IV: END OF STORY?
Steven Taylor has a report that, if true, pretty much ends this one: According to a radio report I just heard, Novak said on Crossfire…
History could prove me wrong but this is looking more and more like a WaPo fantasy.
For it to move from there, we would need those little annoying things called facts.
P
Comment by Paul — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:10 pm
What incentive would there be for the CIA to confirm the name of one of their covert operatives? That makes no sense to me.
Comment by Aaron — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:37 pm
That’s the issue, i.e., was she a covert operative, or an analyst? Not all CIA types are covert. I don’t know the answer, nor do I know who is telling the truth here–I just find the whole story odd, and if the May piece is correct, it may be that she was analyst and not a covert type.
We shall see how it all emerges.
Comment by Steven — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 4:56 pm
NOVAK-GATE IV: END OF STORY?
Steven Taylor has a report that, if true, pretty much ends this one: According to a radio report I just heard, Novak said on Crossfire…
Trackback by OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY — Monday, September 29, 2025 @ 7:10 pm