Comments on: Steyn Goes Over the Top http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273 A rough draft of my thoughts... Mon, 08 Oct 2024 21:08:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: PoliBlog ™: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Steyn on Pinochet http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-1130751 Wed, 13 Dec 2024 20:28:42 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-1130751 [...] I have never been as impressed with Mark Steyn as have many in the Rightward side of the ‘Sphere. Recently, I have found him to be rather outrageous (for example, here and here–and, in fairness, the one time I quoted him approval, it ends up he was quite wrong). [...] […] I have never been as impressed with Mark Steyn as have many in the Rightward side of the ‘Sphere. Recently, I have found him to be rather outrageous (for example, here and here–and, in fairness, the one time I quoted him approval, it ends up he was quite wrong). […]

]]>
by: Dr. Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-758581 Mon, 03 Jul 2024 14:28:27 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-758581 Matthew, Both valid points--and I should have commented on that ill-advised pun. And anonymous: truth is, I tend to do as you advise, but saw the headline and felt the need to comment. Matthew,

Both valid points–and I should have commented on that ill-advised pun.

And anonymous: truth is, I tend to do as you advise, but saw the headline and felt the need to comment.

]]>
by: anonymous email http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-757879 Mon, 03 Jul 2024 10:47:35 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-757879 Mark Steyn was never and will never be a bright journalist. I recommend you to ignore his articles. Mark Steyn was never and will never be a bright journalist. I recommend you to ignore his articles.

]]>
by: PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » Quick judgments on Hamdan decision http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-756618 Mon, 03 Jul 2024 03:24:42 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-756618 [...] ents on Hamdan decision By Bryan S. (guestblogger) @ 10:24 pm What Dr. Taylor wrote earlier this afternoon, coupled with my earlier post suggests that the “frame” of the recen [...] […] ents on Hamdan decision
By Bryan S. (guestblogger) @ 10:24 pm

What Dr. Taylor wrote earlier this afternoon, coupled with my earlier post suggests that the “frame” of the recen […]

]]>
by: Matthew Shugart (Guestblogger) http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-756452 Sun, 02 Jul 2024 23:56:51 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10273#comment-756452 Well, given that a more appropriate definition of <i>jihad</i> might be "<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&hs=9wV&lr=&safe=active&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&defl=en&q=define:Jihad&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title" rel="nofollow">striving in the way of God</a>," I should have to think that "the right to jihad" has been in the US Constitution for a good long time. If I were a Muslim, I would be really offended by Steyn's phrasing (not that he's unusual here). And if I were a Jew, I think I would be rather offended by his far-too-clever turn of phrase at the end of the same paragraph in which you quoted his comments on jihad. Well, given that a more appropriate definition of jihad might be “striving in the way of God,” I should have to think that “the right to jihad” has been in the US Constitution for a good long time.

If I were a Muslim, I would be really offended by Steyn’s phrasing (not that he’s unusual here). And if I were a Jew, I think I would be rather offended by his far-too-clever turn of phrase at the end of the same paragraph in which you quoted his comments on jihad.

]]>