But I like it: Shat for the Peace Prize!

So, since you are a university professor in the social sciences, does that mean you really are qualified to nominate Shatner for the Peace Prize if you wanted to? If so, it seems like there is a real problem with the nominating system.

You’re are right Dr. Taylor it is silly but who started such silliness? If exposing the threat of manbearpig to world is deserving of a peace prize certainly exposing the dangers of liberalism is as worthy.

They know that there is really no such thing as a Nobel Prize “nomination” in the commonly understood sense of the word, and they know that the public is generally unaware of this. Thus, they are lying and they know they are lying.

I will simply make a mental note from this day forward that Mark Levin is a liar. This kind of behavior simplifies greatly the process of dividing the political world into the trustworthy and the untrustworthy.