I can’t say for sure, but I think I read that phrase once years ago about an Israeli election. (I know I have read it about many a PR election over the years.) I mean, what is so complex about getting a share of 120 seats that almost exactly the same as your share of national votes, as is the case in Israel? Seems pretty simple to me.
But then nothing is less complex than the American political process. Sure thing. And every American can tell you all the details of beautifully simple rules like the presidential primaries and the electoral college and all the other US electoral systems that the whole world would like to emulate.
]]>Fujimori is running on the national list. The list is open, so presumably the party has determined that his celebrity might bring a few extra votes to the party.
…
While I am fairly certain he’d fail to win the nominal race in a district, his celebrity could attract some protest votes to the national list of such a small party, if that is where he is running. In fact, if the party is not actually serious about getting him elected, but just wanted the publicity, he’s running in the constituency race. If, on the other hand, this is a deal to get both national attention for the PNP and to get him immunity (as has been alleged), then he’s on the list. Not that the latter would guarantee him election, of course, given that it is the PNP’s voters who will determine the rank on the (open) list.
A little time on news searches did not turn up the answer as to which tier he is running in.
]]>