Comments on: Mueller Contradicts Gonzales Testimony

by: Dr. Steven Taylor

Fri, 27 Jul 2025 19:02:22 +0000

Well, actually, the initial testimony about the wiretapping took place before the USA business broke.

And while the USA situation is relevant, this is not all that this is about.

And while the firings were legal, you really have no grounds upon which to assert that they were “normal” as they were assuredly well outside the norm–as the CRS Report that I have cited before noted.

You are well within your rights to dismiss those firings, however to assert that they were normal and to act as if the administration has acquitted itself well in explaining their actions takes a great deal of purposefully ignoring the facts.

And while Specter had never been my favorite Senator, I fail to see how any of his actions equate to his being “power mad.”

by: Steve Plunk

Fri, 27 Jul 2025 18:52:19 +0000

The AG is entering a hostile environment every time he testifies. He answers questions in an efficient manner to the best of his ability. Some of the topics are not meant to be discussed in public and senators like Schumer know it but they ask anyway in order to create dramatic political theater. This was clearly illustrated by their exchange in the news.

You’re right, it’s not a discussion about the weather but it is also not about the federal government eavesdropping on Americans. This is about the USA firings and congressional meddling. The domestic spying issues are periphial. The weather example is used to point out this is far from perjury. It is differing opinions about perceptions that can vary greatly.

As much as a political fight we also have the balance of power fight. Congress wants to exercise more than what the administration believes it should have. Power drunk Republicans like Spectre are criticizing Gonzales more for his standing up to them than anything else.

It still bothers me that we are even on this subject. The firings were legal and normal.

by: Dr. Steven Taylor

Fri, 27 Jul 2025 14:58:27 +0000

Steve,

Then why doesn’t he just own up and state that there was “some” disagreement. The inability of Gonzales to answer serious questions in a straightforward manner is problematic.

This is not just about a dispute over the weather, it is about using the power of the federal government to eavesdrop on American citizens (at a minimum).

And it isn’t just Democrats–Republicans have been critical of Gonzales as well.

by: Steve Plunk

Fri, 27 Jul 2025 14:29:46 +0000

I believe Gonzales said there were no “major” disagreements within the justice department over the TSP program. It’s a difference in perception that is far from perjury. I would liken it to some one describing the day a mostly sunny when in fact it was partly cloudy. It doesn’t really matter.

The committee members are calling Gonzales a liar at every turn but basically cannot find anything of real substance other than differing opinions. It’s a political circus and little more. The firings were legal and the reasons behind them are the administration’s business. Everything else is bluster in order to make Bush and his administration look bad.

It’s the payback the Dems promised. It’s shameful.