True that. I think the reasonable response for anyone who looks at her blog and see the shrieking hysterical insanity leaping off the page is to dismiss her as an outrageous kook.

Except last night she was one of the guests on Fox News’ “Red Eye” with Greg Gutfield. And she previously was granted an interview with UN ambassador John Bolton.

When kooks like Gellar are being promoted by a major news network and high level gov’t official we have a serious problem for the state of political discourse.

I can’t understand why *anybody* would consider a line from Pam Gellar as somehow credible. Kinda goes along with the level of insanity, generally.

Everyone keeps picking that particular line from Pam Gellar. I find this curious, since I found this line to be even more absurd:

It is the fascist blueprint to create a police state and legalize gulags. This is not a spoof. This is Obama’s “civilian army’s” MOB.

Hey, do you think Michelle Malkin is some kind of super-duper deep cover plant performing some kind of Sokal Hoax? Here’s what she said back in ’05 when it was disclosed that the FBI had been engaging in surveillance of non-violent groups

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin072005.html3

Oh, dear. Oh, dear. Civil liberties activists, anti-war organizers, eco-militants, and animal rights operatives are in a fright over news that the nefarious FBI is watching them. Why on earth would the government be worried about harmless liberal grannies, innocent vegetarians, unassuming rainforest lovers and other “peaceful groups” simply exercising their First Amendment rights?

Let me remind you of some very good reasons.

[Malkin lists her "reasons" which have nothing to do with the actual surveillance targets, but are meant to demonstrate "the left" are dangerous subversives.]

The FBI’s job is to take threats to our domestic security seriously and act on them before catastrophe strikes. Given the suspect words and actions of left-wing groups over the last several years, “dissent is patriotic” is a bromide no responsible agent can swallow blindly. Tolerating the unfettered free speech of saboteurs has threatened enough lives already.

This has to be some kind world record for hypocrisy.

I think it’s silly to define “rightwing extremist groups” as groups that are mostly “hate oriente” (page 2, I guess this is in comparison to violent leftwing groups that are mostly love oriented)

The point is that most violent groups are hate oriented in some way. Frankly, it’s hard to imagine any other possibility.

Which, by the way, is why I think hate crime legislation is silly. “You brutally murdered the victim and torched his house, but we think the motivation was a long-standing grudge and not outright hate.”