Comments on: Re-Launch, Take Two http://poliblogger.com/?p=1917 A rough draft of my thoughts... Mon, 08 May 2024 21:34:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 by: Paul http://poliblogger.com/?p=1917#comment-7563 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1917#comment-7563 But he served in Vietnam!?!?!?! But he served in Vietnam!?!?!?!

]]> by: Mike Van Winkle http://poliblogger.com/?p=1917#comment-7562 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1917#comment-7562 I think after New Hampshire there are going to be a lot of candidates removing themselves from the race. There's got to be a point where the costs out weigh any expected benefit. Kerry's done. This is mainly due to the fact that no one knows what his campaign is about about. Gephardt's is about NAFTA, trade unions and the manufacturing economy. Not a winning formula, but its a formula. Dean's formula is new-age populism (sort of). Clark's is supposed to be foreign policy. Kerry's got name recognition and that's about it. I think after New Hampshire there are going to be a lot of candidates removing themselves from the race. There’s got to be a point where the costs out weigh any expected benefit.

Kerry’s done. This is mainly due to the fact that no one knows what his campaign is about about. Gephardt’s is about NAFTA, trade unions and the manufacturing economy. Not a winning formula, but its a formula. Dean’s formula is new-age populism (sort of). Clark’s is supposed to be foreign policy. Kerry’s got name recognition and that’s about it.

]]>