Comments on: Unfit for Command co-Author is Pretty Unfit Himself http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288 A rough draft of my thoughts... Wed, 10 Oct 2024 02:53:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: PoliBlog ™: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » When Swift Boaters Come Home to Roost (Immigration Edition) http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-1362701 Wed, 30 May 2024 18:21:58 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-1362701 [...] Jerome Corsi, one of the co-authors of Unfit for Command (the anti-Kerry book by Swift Book Veterans for Truth) has entered the fray. (I commented on Corsi here, here and here ). I have noted some of his writing online recently, but have largely ignored them. [...] […] Jerome Corsi, one of the co-authors of Unfit for Command (the anti-Kerry book by Swift Book Veterans for Truth) has entered the fray. (I commented on Corsi here, here and here ). I have noted some of his writing online recently, but have largely ignored them. […]

]]>
by: bryan http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16162 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16162 It is entirely possible that O'Neil didn't know about Corsi's freeper credentials, only his more traditional credentials. Not saying that it's so, but just throwing out the possibility. It is entirely possible that O’Neil didn’t know about Corsi’s freeper credentials, only his more traditional credentials.

Not saying that it’s so, but just throwing out the possibility.

]]>
by: Charlie (Colorado) http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16163 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16163 I promise to be just as excited about Corsik as Jimmy Carter is about Moore. For crying out loud, read the freaking material and make up your own mind. I promise to be just as excited about Corsik as Jimmy Carter is about Moore.

For crying out loud, read the freaking material and make up your own mind.

]]>
by: The Lonewacko Blog http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16164 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16164 Oh no! He called Perky Katie Couric - America's Morning Sweetheart - "Little Katie Communist"? Horrors! I guess I'll be busy today scrubbing my site of my extensive anti-Katie material lest I get called on the carpet by... Atrios? This article was written by Atrios - a.k.a. Duncan B. Black - and anyone takes it seriously? You know, the <a href="technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fatrios.blogspot.com%2F2004_08_01_atrios_archive.html%23109158422356927904">T-shirt guy?</a> I'd suggest reading each of the posts. I only looked at one and it was taken out of context. The rest are probably similar Atrios-level smears. Oh no! He called Perky Katie Couric - America’s Morning Sweetheart - “Little Katie Communist”?

Horrors! I guess I’ll be busy today scrubbing my site of my extensive anti-Katie material lest I get called on the carpet by…

Atrios? This article was written by Atrios - a.k.a. Duncan B. Black - and anyone takes it seriously? You know, the T-shirt guy?

I’d suggest reading each of the posts. I only looked at one and it was taken out of context. The rest are probably similar Atrios-level smears.

]]>
by: Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16165 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16165 I read a substantial number of them, and was wholly unimpressed. And I started out quite skeptical of the MM post. I read a substantial number of them, and was wholly unimpressed. And I started out quite skeptical of the MM post.

]]>
by: Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16166 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16166 Let's just say that they aren't exactly intellectual-calibre material. Let’s just say that they aren’t exactly intellectual-calibre material.

]]>
by: King of Fools http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16167 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16167 There is something about freeperland which makes so many folk just take their brains out of gear while engaging their tongue/fingers. Maybe it just feels like a safe place to vent and be petty. Great information source and once in a while you find a meaningful discussion. So much of the content is very petty partisanship, though. Similar to DU. There is something about freeperland which makes so many folk just take their brains out of gear while engaging their tongue/fingers.

Maybe it just feels like a safe place to vent and be petty. Great information source and once in a while you find a meaningful discussion. So much of the content is very petty partisanship, though. Similar to DU.

]]>
by: Paul http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16168 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16168 All your above points are taken... However... Joseph Wilson's background is far more damning than Corsi's but he was held up as a paragon of virtue. (That was until it was found he was a lying sack of dung.) The Dems say that the fact he is a loony tune has nothing to so with the charges he levels against Bush. Seems like a double double standard standard to me. All your above points are taken… However…

Joseph Wilson’s background is far more damning than Corsi’s but he was held up as a paragon of virtue.

(That was until it was found he was a lying sack of dung.)

The Dems say that the fact he is a loony tune has nothing to so with the charges he levels against Bush.

Seems like a double double standard standard to me.

]]>
by: The Lonewacko Blog http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16169 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16169 <i>Maybe it just feels like a safe place to vent and be petty</i> Yes, indeed. While anything you type can and perhaps will be used against you by people like Duncan B. Black, I doubt whether these comments were written with the same "voice" with which one might right a letter to The Times. Also, the DU posts I've seen seem to be deadly serious, whereas many of the "Chubbie Chelsea" style comments one sees at FR are meant as a bit of a joke. Also, there's that little matter of Duncan B. Black having a bit of a problem with FR for some reason and attempting to indirectly smear all other FReepers. Maybe it just feels like a safe place to vent and be petty

Yes, indeed. While anything you type can and perhaps will be used against you by people like Duncan B. Black, I doubt whether these comments were written with the same “voice” with which one might right a letter to The Times.

Also, the DU posts I’ve seen seem to be deadly serious, whereas many of the “Chubbie Chelsea” style comments one sees at FR are meant as a bit of a joke.

Also, there’s that little matter of Duncan B. Black having a bit of a problem with FR for some reason and attempting to indirectly smear all other FReepers.

]]>
by: Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16170 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4288#comment-16170 I must admit, I have had never been impressed with anything I have seen on the Freep board--if one looks at it sans partisan bias, it really isn't any different than the DU. And the anti-Catholic and anti-Islam posts of jrlc go beyond playful banter. And the whole "Hell-ary" bit is simply towards the lower levels of discourse. Of course, I don't read Eschaton because I find Black to be almost as juvenile in his daily posts. Drum may annoy me, but at least he is reasonable. Black's posts hardly read like a think-tank economist. And Mr. Wilson clearly has some truth issues, and I don't find him credible. However, while I found Wilson to be arrogant and annoying, and his logic questionable, there was nothing along these lines that I am aware to point to prior to his book. Understand that just saying: "Well, the left liked this guy or that guy" does not excuse someone on the right that you want to believe who may have questionable credentials. I must admit, I have had never been impressed with anything I have seen on the Freep board–if one looks at it sans partisan bias, it really isn’t any different than the DU.

And the anti-Catholic and anti-Islam posts of jrlc go beyond playful banter. And the whole “Hell-ary” bit is simply towards the lower levels of discourse.

Of course, I don’t read Eschaton because I find Black to be almost as juvenile in his daily posts. Drum may annoy me, but at least he is reasonable. Black’s posts hardly read like a think-tank economist.

And Mr. Wilson clearly has some truth issues, and I don’t find him credible. However, while I found Wilson to be arrogant and annoying, and his logic questionable, there was nothing along these lines that I am aware to point to prior to his book.

Understand that just saying: “Well, the left liked this guy or that guy” does not excuse someone on the right that you want to believe who may have questionable credentials.

]]>