Comments on: A Note on Corsi and the Freep Stuff http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323 A rough draft of my thoughts... Wed, 10 Oct 2024 02:52:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: The Lonewacko Blog http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16287 Thu, 12 Aug 2024 05:44:34 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16287 I'll punt on that one. However, let's consider this snippet provided by Duncan B. Black: "Let's see exactly why it isn't the case that Islam is a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion? Where's the proof to the contrary?" Here's the full comment: "We should broadcast these hate words of al-Satan -- if these Islamic "clerics" insist on being such hatemongers, let the world see how morally corrupt their religion is. If Islam doesn't rise up and condemn these "Islamonazis" then the whole religion will look false to the world. Let's see exactly why it isn't the case that Islam is a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion? Where's the proof to the contrary?" The full quote has a few problems. However, it's also a call several other people have made. Why don't more Muslims and Muslim groups condemn terrorism? Why does CAIR, for instance, spend so much time on anonymous complaints from Muslims that someone looked at them crosswise and so little time condemning OBL? Even CAIR's (supposedly) anti-terrorism petition is full of loopholes. I’ll punt on that one.

However, let’s consider this snippet provided by Duncan B. Black:

“Let’s see exactly why it isn’t the case that Islam is a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion? Where’s the proof to the contrary?”

Here’s the full comment:

“We should broadcast these hate words of al-Satan — if these Islamic “clerics” insist on being such hatemongers, let the world see how morally corrupt their religion is. If Islam doesn’t rise up and condemn these “Islamonazis” then the whole religion will look false to the world. Let’s see exactly why it isn’t the case that Islam is a worthless, dangerous Satanic religion? Where’s the proof to the contrary?”

The full quote has a few problems. However, it’s also a call several other people have made. Why don’t more Muslims and Muslim groups condemn terrorism? Why does CAIR, for instance, spend so much time on anonymous complaints from Muslims that someone looked at them crosswise and so little time condemning OBL? Even CAIR’s (supposedly) anti-terrorism petition is full of loopholes.

]]>
by: Hal http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16272 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16272 Amen, brother. Good to see this stuff being posted. It's the only way to sanity. . . Thanks. Amen, brother. Good to see this stuff being posted.

It’s the only way to sanity. . .

Thanks.

]]>
by: James http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16273 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16273 I always thought outrageous was more like a box of chocolates. I always thought outrageous was more like a box of chocolates.

]]>
by: The Lonewacko Blog http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16274 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16274 As I've pointed out before, the big difference between Corsi and Moore/Kos is that Corsi's comments were a) taken out of context, and b) many of them appear to have had a bit of a humorous component. When Kos says "screw 'em" or Moore says Iraq insurgents are equivalent to Minute Men, those comments are not taken out of context and they're being quite serious. As I’ve pointed out before, the big difference between Corsi and Moore/Kos is that Corsi’s comments were a) taken out of context, and b) many of them appear to have had a bit of a humorous component.

When Kos says “screw ‘em” or Moore says Iraq insurgents are equivalent to Minute Men, those comments are not taken out of context and they’re being quite serious.

]]>
by: Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16275 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16275 I just don't see that these comments have been taken out of context. For example: "Islam is a peaceful religion as long as the women are beaten, the boys buggered, and the infidels killed." http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/794226/posts?q=1&&page=51#68 I just don’t see that these comments have been taken out of context.

For example: “Islam is a peaceful religion as long as the women are beaten, the boys buggered, and the infidels killed.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/794226/posts?q=1&&page=51#68

]]>
by: Steven Taylor http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16276 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 18:00:00 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4323#comment-16276 Further, where's the comedy in such a statement? Further, where’s the comedy in such a statement?

]]>