August 17, 2024Much Ado About Nothing (and Speaking of Populism)This Ten Commandments flap is about to drive me crazy. While I value and support the Commandments themselves, I have to ask my fellow Christians a simple quesiton: how would having this momument in the State Supreme Court building actually promote the Christian faith in any substantial way? Similarly, I would ask those who oppose the momument, what the precise societal harm is for the monument to be there? Given that this is Alabama, it is hardly surprising that there is popular support for the monument. Perhaps those who filed the lawsuits to remove the thing should have left well enough alone, this story would have faded frm view, and the monument would gather dust and largely be ignored. And I know the legalities here--I am asking a practical question of actual harm. Regardless, however, as I noted earlier in the week, I find it very difficult to swallow that Chief Justice Moore believes that he has a legitimate right to oppose a court order, especially since he could have filed for a stay while he filed his appeal to the US Supreme Court. There was no need for this grandstanding. Further, the Alabama Supreme Court building is a secular locale, with a secular purpose. Also, from a purely religious point of view, it would seem to me that there are far more productive ways to use energies to promote the cause of Christianity than a rally for this monument. Posted by Steven Taylor at August 17, 2024 09:39 AM | TrackBackComments
You asked, what the actual harm would be... Good question. Maybe I can ask this. What harm would there be in posting a monument of the Torah? Or the Koran? Short of someone tripping over the monument. Posted by: Eric at August 18, 2024 11:38 AMIndeed, there would be none. Posted by: Steven at August 18, 2024 12:03 PMAnother scenario. Replace the 10 commandments monument with a monument to the Koran. Then let the judge be a Muslim with well-known conservative Islamic beliefs. And you, as the defendant, are not of that faith. This fact is publicly known because of dress, nationality or other reason. Two questions: 1. Would you feel you would receive a fair trial? 2. Would this then violate the separation of church/state? Posted by: Eric at August 18, 2024 12:42 PMOne questions: how did this guy get elected in Alabama? ;) Posted by: Steven at August 18, 2024 12:51 PMPost a comment
|
|