August 17, 2024

  • el
  • pt
  • Dead Heat

    Not surprisingly, Arnie and Cruz are in a statistical dead heat (a 4.1% margin of error):

    The California Field Poll found 25 percent of registered voters opted for Bustamante followed by 22 percent for Schwarzenegger.

    And this situation provides a test for an axiom of politics, which is "the perfect is the enemy of the good" (at least in terms of the persepective of the Republican Party in California). At this point, the Republicans have collectively more support, but they are splitting it amongst several candidates:

    The other candidates trailed in single digits: State Sen. Tom McClintock took 9 percent; businessman Bill Simon won 8 percent; former baseball commissioner Peter Ueberroth received 5 percent; all three are Republicans.

    Whoever convinced Insurance Commissioner Garamendi not to run as a Democrat did their party a huge favor.

    The bottom line of electoral politics is that one has to make calculations. The best outcome of an election is for your #1 choice to be elected. However, losing is not the worst outcome. The worst outcome is to lose, and to lose to your least desired opponent. Simon and McClintock are running the serious risk of not only losing (which may be a foregone result), but losing to their worst possible outcome: losing to a Democrat.

    Source: Poll Places Bustamante In Lead to Succeed Davis

    Posted by Steven Taylor at August 17, 2024 10:48 AM | TrackBack
    Comments

    I agree, Steven. Both Simon & McClintock need money. Simon has it but, unlike Ueberroth, still won't commit it - a dumb political move. $2 million might have pre-empted McClintock 3 weeks ago.

    The poll itself is no big surprise or deal: Just establishes basic name ID levels for most. Let's see what happens after a couple of weeks of ads and candidate statements. My guess is AS will look stronger and CB weaker, as almost all Bustamante's support coming from "Noes." If Davis keeps tanking, Bustamante's numbers go with him.

    Posted by: Internet Ronin at August 17, 2024 11:25 AM

    The question is really: Is Arnold at 22% because the rest are waiting to hear his ideas, or is he at 22% because the other 78% think, "No way in hell am I voting for the 'Terminator'"?

    Arnold is near the top because he's got the name recognition -- but for him that's a bad thing. He's probably got more name recognition than Bustamante who looks more like a 'real' candidate.

    You are assuming that Simon voters would pick Arnold as their second (or third) choice, but that's assuming that the major distinction in voters' minds is Dem vs. Repub.

    I'm guessing a lot of the Arnold voters have other celebrities on the top of their list, while Bustamante (and Simon and McClintock) supporters have other real politicians on the top of theirs.

    If I'm a liberal, and Bustamante suddenly drops out, that doesn't mean I'm going to move down and vote for liberal Guido Sarducci -- I'm going to pick a 'real' politician instead.

    Arnold -- at 22% -- has likely peaked. But who's to say that it still won't be enough?

    Posted by: pathos at August 17, 2024 01:03 PM

    Actually, I honestly don't think that he has peaked (at least in the sense that he is now headed downward).

    I think, as I have argued, that his name recognition is a good thing (indeed, name recognition is almost always a good thing).

    And, given that he has some political bona fides (past Republican activism, the proposition he sponsored in 02, etc.), he is more than just a celebrity running.

    And yes, I think that a substantial percentage of Simon, McClintock or even Uberoth voters would vote for Schwarzenegger if those candates were to drop out. There wouldn't be 100% transfer, but there would be some.

    Indeed, I would argue that neither McClintock, nor Simon has a chance in this race and that the California Republican Party would be best served if they dropped out at this time (indeed, if they had never run).

    Posted by: Steven at August 17, 2024 01:11 PM

    Steven,

    Given what you've written in this post, I'm surprised you're not more of a proponent of Instant Runoff Voting, which allows voters to rank candidates. That's the best way to avoid helping elect the least desirable candidate.

    Posted by: Robert Prather at August 19, 2024 10:24 AM

    I am not opposed, per se, but prefer a more traditional run-off system.

    Posted by: Steven at August 20, 2024 11:10 AM
    Post a comment









    Remember personal info?