Dave of the Hedgehog Report brings our attention to this gem from WaPo:
Retired Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark, who said he probably would have voted for the war resolution and later said he would have opposed it, has joined other Democrats in criticizing the administration's current course in Iraq. But spokeswoman Kym Spell said Clark had no position on the $87 billion request. "He's not in Congress," she said. "He's running for president."
That is a stunning statement. One, presidential candidates are supposed to have positions on everything (whether they really should or not). Second, and more importantly: how can one be a candidate for president and not have an opinion on a key element of Bush's Iraq policy. Utterly remarkable.
The WaPo story has the opinions of all the candidates, and Dave breaks out the key ones on his site.
Posted by Steven at October 15, 2024 01:01 PM | TrackBackLast Thursday night, I posted six new entries at my blog - some of them are on the Iraq war situation.
The last of the six, however, points out connections between Wesley Clark & the Clinton administration and Islamic terrorists.
The foreign policy of Clinton and Clark was immoral, illegal, and horrific. Clinton was undoubtedly a very, very terrible president, and Clark would likely make a terrible president as well.