May 16, 2024Yet More Evidence that Campaign Finance "Reform" Doesn't WorkYahoo! News - 'Soft money' may help GOP launch wider attack on Kerry After holding back for months, Republican political operatives say they will compete with Democrats in raising and spending millions of dollars in unregulated "soft money" on this year's presidential election. *sigh* When will legislators learn that they can't stop money from flowing into politics? If companies that sell hamburgers and soda will spend millions and millions annually to get us to buy their products, why is it such a shock that groups and individuals will spend millions and millions to help elect the leader of the free world? A system that allows unlimited contributions to parties and candidates with full and immediate disclosure on the internet would certainly be a far more transparent system than the one we currently have. And it would have the virtue of leaving the First Amerndment alone. Posted by Steven Taylor at May 16, 2024 08:54 PM | TrackBackComments
This whole McCain-Feingold thing is a mess. I belong to a local political group that sponsors debates, has speakers, etc. The Executive Board likes to make endorsements but we decided against endorsing any federal candidates lest we be considered a "527" under a strict reading of the law. However, we did certify that certain candidates are indeed Republican. This is so lame. Posted by: John Lemon at May 16, 2024 09:15 PMTo put it mildly. Posted by: Steven at May 16, 2024 09:16 PMThe worst part is that during the debate of M-F, most of congress knew and accepted that the new law would have zero effect on the amount of money during this election. In fact, during Legislative Aides meetings we were able to tear major holes in any defense the sponsors were able to come up with. Our problem was how to vote against a bill that was so high profile and had coverage that was so one sided. And yes, I know how pathetic that sounds. Posted by: Rob M at May 17, 2024 09:13 AMPost a comment
|
|