http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211 A rough draft of my thoughts... Mon, 08 May 2025 16:35:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-34680 Sun, 27 Mar 2025 12:45:31 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-34680 <strong>cash advance</strong> Please visit the sites dedicated to payday loan cash advance credit card cash advance
Please visit the sites dedicated to payday loan cash advance credit card

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3983 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3983

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3980 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3980 political art show at www.MGITCH.com political art show at www.MGITCH.com

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3974 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3974 Go get gay-married. Liberal kooks. Go get gay-married. Liberal kooks.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3973 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3973 You liberals are worthless. You liberals are worthless.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3971 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3971 I am just amazed at how brazen the anti-conservatism is getting in the media and academia. (I know the latter insults all too well.) This study is an exercise in tautology (defining the problem so as to get your answer in the definition, a.k.a., circular reasoning). Moreover, from what I've seen, the methodology is pretty sloppy as well. First, the margins of difference aren't reported. They say they are aggregating data from numerous studies for a sample size of 22,000 (anything will be statistically significant) and I think they are using some psychometric techniques that have long been suspect. I would like to see the actual report though, which is not online or in print yet (at least not in this neck of the woods). I am just amazed at how brazen the anti-conservatism is getting in the media and academia. (I know the latter insults all too well.) This study is an exercise in tautology (defining the problem so as to get your answer in the definition, a.k.a., circular reasoning). Moreover, from what I’ve seen, the methodology is pretty sloppy as well. First, the margins of difference aren’t reported. They say they are aggregating data from numerous studies for a sample size of 22,000 (anything will be statistically significant) and I think they are using some psychometric techniques that have long been suspect. I would like to see the actual report though, which is not online or in print yet (at least not in this neck of the woods).

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3984 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1211#comment-3984 <strong><i>What is good for the goose</i></strong> I just ran across this MSN news story entitled "Alleged Saddam tape on sons� deaths." It states:*TIKRIT, Iraq, July 30 � Skeptical Iraqis began to show signs on Wednesday that they believed Saddam Hussein�s sons Odai and Qusai were dead... What is good for the goose
I just ran across this MSN news story entitled “Alleged Saddam tape on sons� deaths.” It states:*TIKRIT, Iraq, July 30 � Skeptical Iraqis began to show signs on Wednesday that they believed Saddam Hussein�s sons Odai and Qusai were dead…

]]>