Comments on: Huh? (Mitt Romney Edition)

by: Greg

Tue, 25 Sep 2025 12:40:42 +0000

Doh! I forgot about the Larry Craig/Mark Foley/Ted Haggard crew. We already have self-hate as well.

]]>

by: Greg

Mon, 24 Sep 2025 21:28:34 +0000

Interesting. I thought we were already going down that path.

“It means that Romney does not want the country to be plunged into an abyss of economic ruin,” see Debt, National. “self-hate,” okay, you got me there. “victimization,” see Right, Religious. “and moral-bancruptcy” see Torture.

So the concern then is about adding self-hate to the mix. If that happened then we’d REALLY be screwed.

]]>

by: Dr. Steven Taylor

Mon, 24 Sep 2025 11:30:33 +0000

Sounds like an episode of Sesame Street!

]]>

by: Ian

Mon, 24 Sep 2025 05:46:26 +0000

At least we can say with confidence that the future will be defined by the letters A and U.

]]>

by: Hume’s Ghost

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 17:40:04 +0000

Before reading the comments I was going to say that the Romney quote is dog whistle politics. That ‘ACLU’ equals “godless communism/socialism” and that ‘USA’ equals the Religious Right’s exclusionary vision of a “Christian America”

Then I read the comments and saw the fuller quote. I would say that it supports my assertion.

Romney is playing to the persuction complex of the R.R. and my good pal O’Reilly.

]]>

by: Dr. Steven Taylor

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 14:28:29 +0000

I fear that even with the additional sentences, the whole thing makes only a tad more sense–but only a tad (it was obvious when I read the coin quote, and that was all they had at The Corner, that it was an attempt at a cheap applause line on religion).

I was unaware, btw, that the ACLU was locked in on creating economic ruin for the US. I am not sure how protecting civil liberties accomplished that feat. I have my differences with the ACLU, but please, they aren’t some bogeyman that will destroy the US. Indeed, I have more concern over politicians who ignore civil liberties than those who over-emphasize them.

I still find this to be rather “huh?!”-worthy. Beyond that, the full quote is still quite vacuous.

Sorry, but so it is.

]]>

by: LaurenceB

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 12:34:04 +0000

I often define our future. I’ll just be sitting around and decide to do some future definin’. Sometimes I define it with words, but usually with letters. Letters that stand for something. Acronyms, if you will. Nothing strange about that.

]]>

by: Deb

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 12:30:06 +0000

Classic Mitt. This sort of thing is part of the reason we’ve been saying all along that he has no real chance at it.

]]>

by: mike

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 04:57:21 +0000

Way to go! Take one sentense out of context, and say that it doesn’t make any sense!

“Republicans for Change aren’t afraid to talk about faith. We recognize the hand of the Creator in the founding of our nation. We will fight to keep the words ‘under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance. Have you seen the new dollar coin? ‘In God We Trust’ has been moved. It’s not on the face of the coin anymore, it’s on the edge – virtually invisible, just like the ACLU wants Him to be. I will go to work to get God back on the front of our coin!

“I will fight to make sure our future is not defined by the letters ‘ACLU,’ but by the letters ‘USA.’

For the rest of the speech go here, to read it in context:

http://myclob.pbwiki.com/Mackinac+Republican+Leadership+Conference

]]>

by: Garth

Sun, 23 Sep 2025 03:03:29 +0000

It means that Romney does not want the country to be plunged into an abyss of economic ruin, self-hate, victimization, and moral-bancruptcy that the ACLU agenda would lead to. Romney recognizes the good of the American people. Romney’s optimistic approach self accountability, reduced government, reduced taxes, strong military, strong families, etc., smacks at the “can-do” approach Americans have made famous for over 200 years. We are lucky to have a candidate of his caliber.

]]>