http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683 A rough draft of my thoughts... Mon, 08 May 2025 15:44:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6401 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6401 <a HREF="http://www.unfogged.com/archives/week_2003_09_28.html#000937">unfogged</a> has this piece which says that another anonymous journalist claims to have been contacted with the info as well. Didn't see that in what you have already. unfogged
has this piece which says that another anonymous journalist claims to have been contacted with the info as well. Didn’t see that in what you have already.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6400 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6400 I need clarification on one thing. Did Novak say that he was told not to use her name and did anyway? (regardless of her official status, etc) I thought I read that somewhere. If so, uhhh, isn't that kind of crappy journalism? I need clarification on one thing. Did Novak say that he was told not to use her name and did anyway? (regardless of her official status, etc) I thought I read that somewhere. If so, uhhh, isn’t that kind of crappy journalism?

]]>