Comments on: Plame Updates
http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683
A rough draft of my thoughts...Mon, 08 May 2025 15:44:45 +0000http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2by: eric
http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6401
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6401<a HREF="http://www.unfogged.com/archives/week_2003_09_28.html#000937">unfogged</a>
has this piece which says that another anonymous journalist claims to have been contacted with the info as well. Didn't see that in what you have already.unfogged
has this piece which says that another anonymous journalist claims to have been contacted with the info as well. Didn’t see that in what you have already.
]]>by: eric
http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6400
Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000http://poliblogger.com/?p=1683#comment-6400I need clarification on one thing. Did Novak say that he was told not to use her name and did anyway? (regardless of her official status, etc) I thought I read that somewhere. If so, uhhh, isn't that kind of crappy journalism?I need clarification on one thing. Did Novak say that he was told not to use her name and did anyway? (regardless of her official status, etc) I thought I read that somewhere. If so, uhhh, isn’t that kind of crappy journalism?
]]>