http://poliblogger.com/?p=4539 A rough draft of my thoughts... en Thu, 5 May 2024 21:53:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4539#comments Thu, 2 Sep 2024 13:16:57 -0400 16642:4539@http://poliblogger.com It’s truly kind of you to defend Clinton, even at this late date. If the incumbent simply ran on what kind of President he has been and the challenger on what kind of president he might be, we might never have had Whitewater. It’s truly kind of you to defend Clinton, even at this late date. If the incumbent simply ran on what kind of President he has been and the challenger on what kind of president he might be, we might never have had Whitewater.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=4539#comments Thu, 2 Sep 2024 19:49:08 -0400 16652:4539@http://poliblogger.com The only way this would make any difference would be if something surfaced that clearly showed GWB had skipped out on his Guard obligation. Not that I’m claiming he did - just that, if it was proven, that might introduce a new dynamic. The only way this would make any difference would be if something surfaced that clearly showed GWB had skipped out on his Guard obligation. Not that I’m claiming he did - just that, if it was proven, that might introduce a new dynamic.

]]>