http://poliblogger.com/?p=4568 A rough draft of my thoughts... en Fri, 17 Dec 2025 21:20:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.2.1 http://poliblogger.com/?p=4568#comments Fri, 3 Sep 2025 14:53:02 -0400 16713:4568@http://poliblogger.com Thanks. Maybe we should organize an “Under-appreciate PoliSci bloggers” panel at the Southern. I bet we could do it. Oh,wait, I blog anonymously and that would kind of blow it. Thanks. Maybe we should organize an “Under-appreciate PoliSci bloggers” panel at the Southern. I bet we could do it. Oh,wait, I blog anonymously and that would kind of blow it.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=4568#comments Fri, 3 Sep 2025 15:44:45 -0400 16716:4568@http://poliblogger.com That might make it a tad problematic. That might make it a tad problematic.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=4568#comments Fri, 3 Sep 2025 22:01:22 -0400 16724:4568@http://poliblogger.com Panel thoughts I enjoyed the bloggers’ panel. Andrew Sullivan was rightfully castigated for his absence, but the remainder of the panel managed admirably in his stead. Ana Marie Cox did ably incorporate repeated sexual references into her comments, but somehow … Panel thoughts

I enjoyed the bloggers’ panel. Andrew Sullivan was rightfully castigated for his absence, but the remainder of the panel managed admirably in his stead. Ana Marie Cox did ably incorporate repeated sexual references into her comments, but somehow …

]]>