Comments on: No Suprises from the 11th Circuit http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638 A rough draft of my thoughts... Sat, 31 Dec 2024 19:10:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 by: Arguing with signposts... » 11th circuit doesn’t know when to keep its mouth shut http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35197 Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:59:59 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35197 [...] 11th circuit doesn&#8217;t know when to keep its mouth shut Steven Taylor <a href="http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638">notes</a> the 11th circuit&#8217;s rejection of a Schindler family appeal petition in the ongoing saga of [...] […] 11th circuit doesn’t know when to keep its mouth shut

Steven Taylor notes the 11th circuit’s rejection of a Schindler family appeal petition in the ongoing saga of […]

]]> by: Arguing with signposts... http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35198 Thu, 31 Mar 2024 01:17:57 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35198 <strong>11th circuit doesn't know when to keep its mouth shut</strong> Steven Taylor notes the 11th circuit's rejection of a Schindler family appeal petition in the ongoing saga of Terri Schiavo (cue news music. Voice over: "America Waits: Terri's death watch: Day 12"). I'll say this. The 11th Circuit certainly un... 11th circuit doesn’t know when to keep its mouth shut

Steven Taylor notes the 11th circuit’s rejection of a Schindler family appeal petition in the ongoing saga of Terri Schiavo (cue news music. Voice over: “America Waits: Terri’s death watch: Day 12″).

I’ll say this. The 11th Circuit certainly un…

]]> by: bryan http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35195 Thu, 31 Mar 2024 01:03:21 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35195 I find the blistering attack a bit uncalled for. The congress passed a law, and the president signed it. How is that "demonstrably" at odds with the constitution? Indeed, the Schindlers did what any american has the right to do: "assemble peaceably to petition for a redress of grievances." Indeed, the 11th circuit could have just let the matter lie and kept their fat mouths shut. They didn't have to accept the latest appeal. From appearances, I'd say it was demonstrably petty, not to mention cruel and unusual punishment to open up such a small sliver of hope for the family after rejecting their previous petitions. All they had to do was reject the petition. It seems like they could learn a thing or two from the SCOTUS on the matter of letting sleeping dogs lie. As it is, they open themselves up for further disdain from the other two branches of government. Smart move, that. I find the blistering attack a bit uncalled for. The congress passed a law, and the president signed it. How is that “demonstrably” at odds with the constitution? Indeed, the Schindlers did what any american has the right to do: “assemble peaceably to petition for a redress of grievances.”

Indeed, the 11th circuit could have just let the matter lie and kept their fat mouths shut. They didn’t have to accept the latest appeal. From appearances, I’d say it was demonstrably petty, not to mention cruel and unusual punishment to open up such a small sliver of hope for the family after rejecting their previous petitions. All they had to do was reject the petition. It seems like they could learn a thing or two from the SCOTUS on the matter of letting sleeping dogs lie. As it is, they open themselves up for further disdain from the other two branches of government. Smart move, that.

]]> by: Vote for Judges http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35194 Wed, 30 Mar 2024 23:35:43 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=6638#comment-35194 <strong>We Who Carry Nightsoil</strong> That's where we are now regarding the courts in this country. The judiciary holding the other two branches of government, the states, and the people when acting by referendum, in open contempt. We Who Carry Nightsoil
That’s where we are now regarding the courts in this country. The judiciary holding the other two branches of government, the states, and the people when acting by referendum, in open contempt.

]]>