Comments on: Judiciary Committee to Meet and Vote on Roberts http://poliblogger.com/?p=8210 A rough draft of my thoughts... Tue, 20 Dec 2024 03:38:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2 by: California Yankee http://poliblogger.com/?p=8210#comment-222584 Thu, 22 Sep 2024 17:22:11 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=8210#comment-222584 Sadly, only three committee members chose not to follow <a href="http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2005/09/ginsburg_standa.html" rel="nofollow">Schumer's mythological</a> "answer every quetion to my satisfaction strategy," and declined the opportunity to join <a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/09/the_verdict_on.html" rel="nofollow">Chairman Dean's</a> and <a href="http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/09/reid_roberts_le.html" rel="nofollow">Senator Reid's</a> obstructionism. Sadly, only three committee members chose not to follow Schumer’s mythological “answer every quetion to my satisfaction strategy,” and declined the opportunity to join Chairman Dean’s and Senator Reid’s obstructionism.

]]>
by: PoliBlog: Politics is the Master Science » Roberts Clears Committee http://poliblogger.com/?p=8210#comment-222581 Thu, 22 Sep 2024 17:21:40 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=8210#comment-222581 [...] s, Charles Schumer of New York and Dick Durbin of Illinois &#8212; opposed Roberts. Well, I was wrong about Schumer and Feinstein. Leahy, Kohl (Wisconsin) and Feingold (Wisconsin) voted for Roberts. [...] […] s, Charles Schumer of New York and Dick Durbin of Illinois — opposed Roberts. Well, I was wrong about Schumer and Feinstein. Leahy, Kohl (Wisconsin) and Feingold (Wisconsin) voted for Roberts. […]

]]>