PoliBlog (TM): A Rough Draft of my Thoughts


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Granting access to people in jail is hardly a concession. And if they are indeed diplomats, as Iran states, then they shouldn’t really be in prison this long, should they? Has it been more than a fortnight since they were arrested?

    As to the behaviour that shouldn’t be rewarded, I suppose you are referring to the “TV confessions”, and not the actual capture or release of the soldiers. After all, they may be “axis of evil”, but they are entitled to their sovereignty as a nation.

    I doubt that there was much diplomacy between Iran and the UK (unfortunately). In order to bargain both sides must have something to offer. What could the UK offer, without an unacceptable loss of face? Not even an apology to get their people back.

    Regards and good Easter.

    Comment by james — Friday, April 6, 2007 @ 8:52 am

  2. I agree that all states have the right to protect their territory. I can even live with the notion that the Iranians were acting in good faith over their territorial waters. (Although I am skeptical).

    However, their behavior in terms of threatening trials of espionage, tv confessions and holding them for almost two weeks was unnecessary.

    I wold agree that, in general, access to prisoners should not be a concession. However, if in this specific context the access was granted as a result of the hostage taking itself, I find that problematic.

    A Happy Easter to you as well.

    Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, April 6, 2007 @ 9:11 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.385 Powered by Wordpress