Now all the SFB’s can claim they caused the increase to happen. It’s a no lose position, if there is not an increase they can continue to be the “whistle blower.”
Must be great to have no moral responsibility whatsoever.
Comment by Rodney Dill — Friday, December 31, 2004 @ 12:53 pm
Why should there be a retraction? Possibly all the criticism did some good.
The director of USAID explained the $35 million on 12/29 in a press briefing. It was “petty cash” for the assessment teams. I explain that issue, and cover much more about stingy Americans on my blog.
Now all the SFB’s can claim they caused the increase to happen. It’s a no lose position, if there is not an increase they can continue to be the “whistle blower.”
Must be great to have no moral responsibility whatsoever.
Comment by Rodney Dill — Friday, December 31, 2004 @ 12:53 pm
Why should there be a retraction? Possibly all the criticism did some good.
Comment by The Misanthrope — Friday, December 31, 2004 @ 7:43 pm
The director of USAID explained the $35 million on 12/29 in a press briefing. It was “petty cash” for the assessment teams. I explain that issue, and cover much more about stingy Americans on my blog.
Comment by Chuck Simmins — Saturday, January 1, 2005 @ 9:26 pm