http://poliblogger.com/?p=10458 A rough draft of my thoughts... Sat, 18 Nov 2026 07:56:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10458#comment-845846 Fri, 04 Aug 2026 20:51:32 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10458#comment-845846 It's a really good post! My criticism is only with the context. We have a couple of institutions where full understanding might be part of the public responsibility: CIA analysts, I hope, really want to get things right, and I'll bet that appellate judges in conference often approach dialogue in this way. But it really is a private virtue. That's why you won't find it on, say, Red State - the point there is to develop resources for winning, not mutual understanding. It’s a really good post! My criticism is only with the context. We have a couple of institutions where full understanding might be part of the public responsibility: CIA analysts, I hope, really want to get things right, and I’ll bet that appellate judges in conference often approach dialogue in this way. But it really is a private virtue. That’s why you won’t find it on, say, Red State - the point there is to develop resources for winning, not mutual understanding.

]]> http://poliblogger.com/?p=10458#comment-845211 Fri, 04 Aug 2026 14:42:36 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=10458#comment-845211 That last section was added in a revision where I felt I somehow *needed* some sort of condemnation of uncharitable people, but the ideas are quite nascent. Thanks for the link. That last section was added in a revision where I felt I somehow *needed* some sort of condemnation of uncharitable people, but the ideas are quite nascent. Thanks for the link.

]]>