Comments on: Campaigning Like its 1979… (Obama and No More Nukes) http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594 A rough draft of my thoughts... Wed, 03 Oct 2025 01:47:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Joe Mucia http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364820 Wed, 03 Oct 2025 01:47:49 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364820 Sorry to double post, but I think <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/2/14391/2386" rel="nofollow">Kos has the best rejoinder to the "unserious" charge</a>. Sorry to double post, but I think Kos has the best rejoinder to the “unserious” charge.

]]>
by: Joe Mucia http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364819 Wed, 03 Oct 2025 01:32:23 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364819 While getting rid of nuclear weapons would certainly be difficult (i.e. 5% chance of happening) I think the U.S. seriously pursuing that goal would change the entire dynamic on the issue. If you could get the 5 major powers to agree to give up their nuclear weapons, you could supercede the NPT and create a much larger, more indepth nonproliferation regime with all nuclear materials controlled by a UN agency. All nuclear development outside the UN could be a cause for military action. With the major powers having already given up their nuclear weapons, they would not take the side of a third rate power to block military action, which has been the largest impediment to the original vision of the UN as a international security enforcement agency. While getting rid of nuclear weapons would certainly be difficult (i.e. 5% chance of happening) I think the U.S. seriously pursuing that goal would change the entire dynamic on the issue.

If you could get the 5 major powers to agree to give up their nuclear weapons, you could supercede the NPT and create a much larger, more indepth nonproliferation regime with all nuclear materials controlled by a UN agency. All nuclear development outside the UN could be a cause for military action. With the major powers having already given up their nuclear weapons, they would not take the side of a third rate power to block military action, which has been the largest impediment to the original vision of the UN as a international security enforcement agency.

]]>
by: MSS http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364817 Tue, 02 Oct 2025 22:47:40 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364817 Ah, yes, the latest foreign policy utterance from the candidate who suggests war with Pakistan. Ah, yes, the latest foreign policy utterance from the candidate who suggests war with Pakistan.

]]>
by: Jan http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364814 Tue, 02 Oct 2025 20:00:21 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364814 It strikes me as a sign of his naivety and evidence that he is not politically experienced enough for the office. I like some of what he has had to say, but he also often seems to make these types of statements that seem way off base for how the international system really works. It strikes me as a sign of his naivety and evidence that he is not politically experienced enough for the office.

I like some of what he has had to say, but he also often seems to make these types of statements that seem way off base for how the international system really works.

]]>
by: RealClearPolitics - Blog Coverage http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364813 Tue, 02 Oct 2025 18:57:13 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364813 <strong>Obama Urges Elimination of Nukes</strong> Off The Table: Obama Urges Elimination of Nukes

Off The Table:

]]>
by: Mark http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364812 Tue, 02 Oct 2025 16:55:27 +0000 http://poliblogger.com/?p=12594#comment-1364812 You are so right. The nuclear bomb is now in more countries and more that would never give them up. You are so right. The nuclear bomb is now in more countries and more that would never give them up.

]]>