Really, only the last one is fundamentally about Bachmann. The first two (especially the second) are more about the Founders and the constitution.
- Bachmann and John Quincy Adams
- Bachmann, the Constitution, and Slavery
- Bachmann and the Press
Information | ||
ARCHIVES
September 2024
August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 |
By Steven L. Taylor
Really, only the last one is fundamentally about Bachmann. The first two (especially the second) are more about the Founders and the constitution.
By Steven L. Taylor
Sunday afternoon musing on an electoral college sweeps from me @OTB: Is an Electoral College Sweep even Possible? By Steven L. Taylor
(Originally written for OTB) About a week ago I noticed the following headline, which I meant to blog but never go around to, via the AFP: Colombia halves cocaine production capacity: US
My immediate reaction was that we would soon find out at least one of the following: 1) That cultivation would have grown in Peru and/or, 2) That there was unaccounted migration of cultivation within Colombia (i.e., that the estimates were wrong because cultivators had found new places to grow within Colombia). Well, what do I see a few minutes ago? Via Bloomberg: Peru Cocaine Output Rivals Colombia as World’s Largest, UN Says in Study
And so the cycle continues. Back in the late 1990s the big triumph was the reduction of cultivation levels in Peru (which then led to a substantial increase in Colombia). Now, just as the US and Colombian governments excitedly let us know that cultivation has diminished in Colombia we find that cultivation has shot up in Peru. Speaking of patterns, the response from Washington will likely be a push for additional funds to be spent in Peru (lots of funds, in fact). And then, in about a decade or so, I can write a post about how coca cultivation in down in Peru….and back up in Colombia. The War on Drugs is the gift that keeps on giving, to be sure. You can see the trend in the following graph, which tracks cultivation from 1987 to 2024. Yes, it is a bit out of date, but it is one I had handy, plus the point I want to make requires looking at the 80s, 90s and early 2024s. What we see is that Peru used to be the major source for coca leaf, but after increased pressure on that cultivation, it was eventually pushed in Colombia (note, too, that the general overall level of cultivation remained relatively steady in a given range). As noted above, at the time the Drug Warriors proclaimed the effort in Peru a grand success. Never mind that it had no significant effect on the overall cocaine market. By Steven L. Taylor
The normally loquacious Chávez has been almost silent since emergency surgery in Cuba on June 10th. From me @OTB: What’s up with Chávez? By Steven L. Taylor
By Steven L. Taylor
By Steven L. Taylor
By Steven L. Taylor
Wearing a wire can come back to bite you. From me @OTB: Alabama State Senators Refers to Blacks as “Aborigines” By Steven L. Taylor
Is it reasonable to state that countries with less guns are more likely to become tyrannical than countries with more guns? A question considered by me at OTB: Guns and Democracy By Steven L. Taylor
Next Page »
|
blog advertising is good for you Visitors Since 2/15/03
Blogroll
Advertisement
|
Powered by WordPress