Via McClatchy: Is that really a naked woman in Dick Cheney’s sunglasses?
(An enlarged version of the photo can be seen by clicking through to the McClatchy story above).
And somehow I am thinking that if Cheney had been, in fact, leering at naked women whilst wearing sunglasses, that it is rather unlikely that a photographer would have been present to take a picture of his sunglasses, let alone that said photo would have been handed over to the White House PR people for posting the web site.
It strains credulity to think that such an event took place (i.e., an outdoor naked party with the veep) and somehow it was kept quiet despite the presence of a guy with a camera.
I did find the following speculation as to what Cheney was looking at from Brian Ross’ The Blotter to be rather amusing:
Cthulu? A woman in her birthday suit? A naked alien? Osama bin Laden?
Update: USAT’s On Deadline blog has a much better hi res closeup of the sunglasses here.
Sphere: Related Content
April 11th, 2024 at 10:40 am
OK, to believe this is a naked woman, you have to believe that this photographer was:
1. At this weird party.
2. Only interested in taking pictures of the Veep.
3. Not at ALL interested in the large sums of money that would surely be made by releasing both this picture and other more compromising ones.
I mean, seriously, if you were at this supposed party (there’s really no better word, sorry), would you just be taking pictures of the veep and his sunglasses? I think not.
April 11th, 2024 at 11:59 am
[...] PoliBlog: And somehow I am thinking that if Cheney had been, in fact, leering at naked women whilst wearing sunglasses, that it is rather unlikely that a photographer would have been present to take a picture of his sunglasses, let alone that said photo would have been handed over to the White House PR people for posting the web site. [...]
April 12th, 2024 at 4:44 pm
My guess is she was naked because her husband is a bitter about losing his job and went out to play with his guns in church.