Wrote James Joyner today:
Iranians voted today in an election to choose a president who has the power to run the parts of the government that do not interest the ruling mullahs.
Indeed.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments/Trackbacks (3)|
The views expressed in the comments are the sole responsibility of the person leaving those comments. They do not reflect the opinion of the author of PoliBlog, nor have they been vetted by the author.
June 17th, 2024 at 3:23 pm
Well, Joyner’s line is a good one, but I think we should not assume this is somehow a sham. “Sham” elections do not have uncertainty over their outcome. Enter uncertainty, and the candidates have an incentive to appeal to whatever sentiment might swing the result. If we get a runoff between Rafsanjani and Moin (which would be the first one-on-one contest in Iranian history), I think that could be quite significant.
No, I am not saying we’re about to see Iran’s version of the Orange Revolution. But I would suggest that this election could be a piece of a broader evolution that has been going on–though not in a linear fashion–for some time now.
I used the Iranian case as a case study on an exam a few years ago. (Steve will recall that I once taught a course called Regime Change before that term went mainstream. I meant it as an internal process, by the way.) My students came to the conclusion that this is a genuine hybrid regime. There is some limited accountability to the electorate, even if final say rests with an unelected body. Dual sovereignty in a strangely institutionalized sort of way. That is precisely what Joyner refers to.
So, again, that the elected authorities do not have the final say on the most important policy questions does not mean that this is a meaningless affair. Competitive elections hardly ever are, despite the best efforts of reactionary forces.
June 17th, 2024 at 3:32 pm
I will grant that the election isn’t meaningless, although I vacilate in my own mind over precisely how to interpret the significance of the process.
And I applaud your entry of that long comment into the still unfixed comment box.
June 17th, 2024 at 5:07 pm
It is hard to deter me from being long winded. But we’ve been over that before.