If one’s professor is telling one that one’s answer on an exam is almost entirely incomplete and focuses on the wrong issues and then proceeds to explain the proper response, which bear no resemblance to what one wrote, why would one wish to continue arguing that one has answered the question?
Such a scenario is doubly fun when one states that all one wants to know is the answer, and to learn, yet clearly the point totals are one’s ultimate concern.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments/Trackbacks (3)|
The views expressed in the comments are the sole responsibility of the person leaving those comments. They do not reflect the opinion of the author of PoliBlog, nor have they been vetted by the author.
March 29th, 2024 at 3:18 pm
One sometimes wishes one could be a fly on the wall…
March 29th, 2024 at 5:10 pm
Obviously the student in question believes he is right an is a man/woman of principle and would argue their perceived to be correct response to the death.
March 29th, 2024 at 8:28 pm
I’m glad that’s not me you’re talking about, but we really do need to have that talk about irrationality one day.