Afghanistan’s heroin-producing poppy crop set another record this season, despite intensified eradication efforts, the American ambassador said Tuesday.
Ambassador William Wood said preliminary data show that Afghan farmers harvested 457,135 acres of opium poppies this year, up from 407,715 acres last year. The growing industry fuels the Taliban, crime, addiction and government corruption.
Government-led eradication efforts destroyed about 49,420 acres of poppies this year, a “disappointing” outcome, Wood told reporters at his private residence overlooking Kabul.
I know that I am quite the fatalist on this point, but my guess is that there will be yet another record next year. And, even if we do start eradicating crops, I have no doubt that there will still be plenty of poppies to make all the heroin that the market will bear.
It is not surprising in the least, yet still depressing in the extreme, that the US government thinks that exporting the Andean coca-eradication model will actually lead to any appreciable change to the Afghanistan poppy situation. It is like copying the Oakland Raider’s offensive plan from last season because, after all, they did score a few touchdowns.
I am sorry, but I don’t think we have taken near the steps that we could to eradicate the heroin trade in Afghanistan because it would destabilize the government that we have put in place. In short, it may hurt the American people, but it is not in our short term interest.
My underlying point is that we probably don’t even have the ability needed to eradicate the heroin trade.
However, if you think that War on Drugs thinking can’t interfere with anti-terrorism policy, I give you this.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 8:55 am
It’s not that easy to find poppies in Afghanistan. They grow very fast. Poppies that were not on a farm a week ago can be there today.
And - they can be planted in patches with other plants, making observation from the air (hard to begin with) almost impossible.
Also, they can be grown out in the wildlands in patches only the planters know to look for, and only accessible by pack animal and foot traffic.
And remember, even if you find poppies on a patch of land, you may not be able to link the property to an individual. Physical records of even such simple things as property ownership are hard to come by over there. And you also have some legal concerns in the Afghan government, even if you don’t have an obstructing official. Their are search protocol in the new Afghan government.
What you’re talking about, if you want to eradicate poppy crops, is boots on the ground, and a whole lot of them - a lot more than we have to spare. And then you probably make a lot of people mad, and perhaps inspire bigger problems, perhaps a more active insurgency in Afghanistan.
At some point you have to ask the question, is it worth it?
Comment by Captain D. — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 11:15 am
At some point you have to ask the question, is it worth it?
Exactly.
And a great deal of what you mention is true (although not all) for coca as well. The depressing fact of the matter is that we have spent billions and billions of dollars (indeed, trillions) to fight coca cultivation to literally no real avail and we appear willing to head down the same path for poppies.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 11:23 am
Clashes between police and drug traffickers in a slum in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro have left at least 13 people dead, officials say.
Guns and grenades were used in the fighting, with armoured vehicles and helicopters backing police units.
The violence began when more than 1,000 policemen advanced on Alemao, the slum stronghold of a drug-dealing gang.
Rio de Janeiro officials are trying to make the city safer before it hosts the Pan-American games on 13 July.
[…]
More than 30 people had been killed and 80 injured since the police first surrounded the slums in northern Rio known as the German Complex on 2 May.
But Wednesday’s police operation was the biggest to date, triggering fierce fighting for several hours in the slums which are home to some 100,000 people.
The city is expecting around 800,000 tourists for the games and will also be hosting “the global series of Live Earth rock concerts on 7 July.”
Not sure I understand the post title. “Literal” drug war? Were bags of marijuana shooting it out with vials of cocaine? Or maybe it was people fighting, but using drugs as weapons? (Catapulting ecstasy pills at the enemy?)
It’s bad enough that we call it a drug war (and I do it all the time), but what you’re describing is a literal war, not a literal drug war. And unfortunately, it’s happening all over the world, including right here in the United States, complete with police forces with armored personnel carriers and military weapons.
Actually I used the would “warfare”–the grenades and such.
Sometimes the drug war is metaphorical and all too frequently it is actual warfare. In terms of an urban conflict, the one described in the article that I quoted is pretty extreme.
However, I am rather aware of the overall issue.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, June 29, 2025 @ 8:25 am
The capture of Herrera was one of the most important drug trafficking arrests in Colombia in recent years, a U.S. law enforcement official said Tuesday. Herrera is thought to have worked for various Colombian and Mexican cartels, he said.
[…]
A 2025 indictment in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleges that Herrera annually managed the shipment of several multi-ton loads of Colombian cocaine, ferrying it by air, land or sea to U.S. markets via Central America and Mexico.
After escaping from the Mexico City jail, Herrera allegedly did anything but retire. Authorities say he became instrumental in repatriating hundreds of millions of dollars in illicit profit from Colombian drug traffickers.
Sources said that Herrera was seized while arranging for a single-engine aircraft to carry $25 million from Central America to Colombia.
The piece starts with a story about how he tried to bribe the cops with $5 million. Apparently he can afford it:
After Herrera’s arrest in Mexico in April 2025, police searching his house in Guatemala found $14 million in cash. Herrera has “many properties” in Colombia and was heavily involved in laundering the drug profits he helped bring back here, DAS detectives said.
Opium production in Afghanistan is soaring out of control, the annual UN report on illegal drugs says.
The World Drug Report says more than 90% of illegal opium, which is used to make heroin, comes from Afghanistan.
It says cultivation of opium poppies increased dramatically in the country, despite the presence of more than 30,000 international troops there.
The report says Afghanistan is unlikely to regain real security until the production of illegal drugs is tackled.
And that makes for a bleak forecast for Afghanistan, as the US and its allies are seeking to apply the same basic policies that have been used to combat coca cultivation in Colombia to the poppy problem in Afghanistan. Indeed, the new ambassador to Afghanistan, William Wood, was previously the ambassador to Colombia.
Given the utter lack of success in controlling the cultivation of coca, let along the amount of cocaine produced in the Andes, it is highly unlikely that we will be able to control the cultivation of opium poppies in Afghanistan. (On the topic of coca cultivation, there is an excellent column translated from El Tiempo over at Plan Colombia and Beyond that I had meant to note several days ago. While I am not sanguine about the policy recommendations it makes, the basic assessment of the problem is spot on).
in the tranquility, authorities see an increasingly sophisticated cocaine trade positioned to supply Brazil’s megacities to the east and Europe beyond.
The gateway for that trade is an imposing tangle of swamps, rivers, and rainforest along the 2,130-mile Brazil-Bolivia border, a daunting frontier neither country guards especially closely.
Bolivia has only one border officer for every 13 miles. On the Brazilian side, the sparse 100 border posts are manned by a patchwork of local and national officers.
Chemicals used to turn Bolivian coca leaf into cocaine flow easily from Brazil, and processed coca paste slips back just as easily, officials say.
“We have noticed a growth in the traffic of cocaine, and principally cocaine paste, over the last two years,” Marcio Paulo Buzanelli, director of the Brazilian Intelligence Agency, told The Associated Press. “One indication of this are the seizures in the Brazilian states that border Bolivia.”
Having been in the Amazon region where Colombia, Peru and Brazil come together as well as deeper into the Peruvian Amazon, it is hardly a surprise to learn that it is difficult to control what goes along these borders–especially the less populated the area.
In Peru I did see a law enforcement presence, part of which was clearly aimed at the drug trade. However, when ones looks at the handful of planes and boats and then looks out at the vast jungle and the seemingly endless rivers, and it is clear that if one wanted to move contraband, that it wouldn’t be all that difficult to do so if one knew the area.
This is just another in a long list of reasons why the drug trade is so difficult to control.
Despite record drug eradication efforts, a White House survey found production of coca in Colombia rose for the third consecutive year in 2025, President Alvaro Uribe said.
Uribe, who travels to Washington on Wednesday to secure the continued flow of U.S. anti-drug aid, revealed the findings of the still unreleased report at the end of a long speech Friday. A transcript was posted Sunday on the president’s Web site.
Uribe said the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy survey, which is based on satellite imagery, found that production rose 8 percent last year, to 156,000 hectares (385,484 acres) — an area twice the size of New York City.
I mean, really, who could’ve seen that coming?
This also contradicts statements from the US government from about a month ago.
Certainly when compared to the stated goals, the current policy is an abject failure:
One of Plan Colombia’s main goals was to halve production of coca within five years, but the latest estimate indicates 27 percent more coca is being produced than in 1999, the year before the anti-drug effort went into effect. A recent dip in the U.S. street price of cocaine, and rise in purity, also points to abundant supply.
Despite this, the response is predictable: there will be a call for more money to be spent to try and eradicate more hectares and yet regardless of how much money we spend we are going to be in the same place a few years from now, looking back and saying “well, we just need a few more million, and then we’ll get ‘em”–and meanwhile the cultivation of the coca plant with continue as will the consumption of the drug.
One wonders at what point we stop and actually reassess if this is a smart way to spend the taxpayers’ money.
I’m going to make a prediction: If the war czar is destined to be as successful as the drug czar, then jihadists will soon be setting off bombs in our cities with impunity.
‘…why do we keep appointing “Czars”?’ I know this is a rhetorical question, I just want to point out that I think the term ‘czar’ originated when President Nixon named William Simon “Energy Czar” during the energy crunch of the 1970’s … just about the same time that we started appending ‘gate’ to any scandals (as in Watergate)!
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Wednesday, May 16, 2025 @ 10:14 am
I’m wondering why he took the job. It seems to carry no power (unless he can back down Gates, Rice, Cheney and a bunch of 4-star generals), just responsibility.
Comment by Barry — Wednesday, May 16, 2025 @ 12:09 pm
I’ve wondered about the czar thing as well (and I’ve found it funny that it’s not “drug tsar”). I don’t remember the czar being considered any more aggressive than other royalty (aside from Peter the Great).
Of course “I’m going to appoint a drug king to handle this” just doesn’t send the same message. Maybe a President with German heritage can propose a “war kaiser,” a Hispanic President can suggest an “energy rey” and a less-cultured President can just say a “drug emperor.” Even those don’t have quite the ring.
Comment by Max Lybbert — Wednesday, May 16, 2025 @ 6:34 pm
Indeed.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Wednesday, May 16, 2025 @ 7:14 pm
Steven,
I thought we had a Commander in Chief or something or other. Why do we need one more person who has no authority or cannot make decisions? Don’t we have a Secretary of Defense? A President? Can this get any more surreal?
Plus, why the affinity with Tsarist Russia? The Romanovs did not end up that well off, if I remember correctly.
US aid to Colombia is helping stem the flow of cocaine coming out of the South American country, the head of Washington’s top anti-narcotics agency said here Tuesday.
“Plan Colombia is working. The amount of land used for the cultivation of coca is at an historic low in Colombia,” the head of the US Drug Enforcement Administration, Karen Tandy, told a drug law enforcement conference in Madrid.
Of course, the cultivation metric is a favorite amongst drug warriors, never mind that it doesn’t really mean much.
Two problems:
1) Even if the numbers of hectares under cultivation in Colombia are at “historic low[s]” that doesn’t mean that a) the overall number of hectares under cultivation are at similar lows (it can be grown elsewhere, and cultivation has been increasing in Peru), and b) that still doesn’t mean that the actual supply of cocaine has been substantially altered. (Note, also, a careful reading of the first paragraph that aid is “helping”–hardly as definitive an outcome as the headline suggests).
and
2) There is still the problem that price isn’t going up, a key metric for determining if interdiction policies are actually working.
Billions of dollars in aid to Colombia have failed to drive up the price of cocaine on American streets, the head of the top U.S. anti-narcotics agency said on Tuesday.
Officials in Washington have said crop spraying and military pressure on drug-smuggling guerrillas and paramilitaries would make cocaine more expensive in the United States following a U.S.-backed offensive launched in 2025.
But the Drug Enforcement Administration’s chief said that a higher price — a key indicator of success in the war on drugs — had failed to sustain itself for long.
And I am sorry, but this is perhaps one of the saddest examples of rationalization that I have seen in a long time:
U.S. and Colombian officials say the failure of the cocaine price to move may be due to effects including hidden stashes of cocaine coming on to the market.
Yeah, that’s it, that’s the ticket: the policies really are working, but it is just those secret stashes that are keeping prices down.
[…] In not-so-related-except-for-a-word news cocaine prices haven’t come down despite U.S. and Columbian efforts to destroy coca crops. The supply front of the Drug War isn’t working, and American demand has no sign of disapating. Like the Cuban embargo decades of ineffective policy should be a signal to alter course. Save and Share: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]
I am sorry, but I don’t think we have taken near the steps that we could to eradicate the heroin trade in Afghanistan because it would destabilize the government that we have put in place. In short, it may hurt the American people, but it is not in our short term interest.
Comment by Talmadge East — Thursday, July 19, 2025 @ 10:43 pm
My underlying point is that we probably don’t even have the ability needed to eradicate the heroin trade.
However, if you think that War on Drugs thinking can’t interfere with anti-terrorism policy, I give you this.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 8:55 am
It’s not that easy to find poppies in Afghanistan. They grow very fast. Poppies that were not on a farm a week ago can be there today.
And - they can be planted in patches with other plants, making observation from the air (hard to begin with) almost impossible.
Also, they can be grown out in the wildlands in patches only the planters know to look for, and only accessible by pack animal and foot traffic.
And remember, even if you find poppies on a patch of land, you may not be able to link the property to an individual. Physical records of even such simple things as property ownership are hard to come by over there. And you also have some legal concerns in the Afghan government, even if you don’t have an obstructing official. Their are search protocol in the new Afghan government.
What you’re talking about, if you want to eradicate poppy crops, is boots on the ground, and a whole lot of them - a lot more than we have to spare. And then you probably make a lot of people mad, and perhaps inspire bigger problems, perhaps a more active insurgency in Afghanistan.
At some point you have to ask the question, is it worth it?
Comment by Captain D. — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 11:15 am
At some point you have to ask the question, is it worth it?
Exactly.
And a great deal of what you mention is true (although not all) for coca as well. The depressing fact of the matter is that we have spent billions and billions of dollars (indeed, trillions) to fight coca cultivation to literally no real avail and we appear willing to head down the same path for poppies.
Comment by Dr. Steven Taylor — Friday, July 20, 2025 @ 11:23 am