Information
ARCHIVES
Wednesday, February 2, 2024
By Steven L. Taylor

Via the LAT: Maybe Anyone Can Be President

In 1772, Austria joined Prussia and Russia in dividing up Poland, which had been weakened by the election of a foreign-born head of state.

Fifteen years later, America’s Founding Fathers, leery of repeating Poland’s experience, added the following to their new Constitution: “No person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Today, a national — if fledgling — campaign is underway to allow foreign-born citizens to hold the nation’s highest office. Supporters expect congressional hearings on the proposal this year.

If the constitution is to amended anytime soon, this amendment probably has the best chance of any serious proposal of which I am aware. Mostly because if it is written in a way that precludes Schwarzenegger from running it won’t be radically controversial, but will have seem reasonable. Plus, it isn’t like it would cause a firestorm of change to much of anything given that the number of actual foreign-born candidates is likely to always be quite low.

Still, politicians like Schwarzenegger and Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm have demonstrated to both parties (and voters) that there may in fact be foreign-born candidates worthy of the position in the future.

Still, I won’t lay any bets as yet:

Polls show that most Americans oppose amending the “natural born clause,” though a Gallup Poll released recently showed that opposition fell — from 67% to 58% — when Schwarzenegger’s name was mentioned to those surveyed. A Field Poll last fall found that even in California, where Schwarzenegger’s approval ratings then approached 70%, nearly 60% of registered voters surveyed opposed a constitutional amendment.

Regardless, this amendment would have a far higher probability of passage than, say, the Federal Marriage Amendment.

Filed under: Uncategorized | Comments/Trackbacks (3)|
The views expressed in the comments are the sole responsibility of the person leaving those comments. They do not reflect the opinion of the author of PoliBlog, nor have they been vetted by the author.

3 Responses to “The Arnold Amendment?”

  • el
  • pt
    1. Director Mitch Says:

      Let me say I like Aunuld. I voted for Aunuld. If he runs for gov again or California senator (one can wish) I’ll vote for him again. And as a republican, I am happy to see a republican who can not only win in California, but also campaign to help other republicans nationwide (his speech at the repub convention was awesome).

      But I am against this amendment. I don’t believe in tailoring the Constitution for one man, and there is the law of unintended consequences.

    2. Signifying Nothing Says:

      Amending for Arnold back in the news
      Steven Taylor notes a lengthy piece in today’s Los Angeles Times looking at efforts to amend the Constitution to permit naturalized citizens to serve as president and vice-president. The article also looks at the historical circumstances that gave ri…

    3. Diggers Realm Says:

      Constitutional Amendment Allowing Foreign Born Citizens To Run For President
      Recent polls show that opposition to an amendment to the constitution allowing foreign born individuals to run for president has declined from 67% to 58%. Los Angeles Times In 1772, Austria joined Prussia and Russia in dividing up Poland, which…


    blog advertising is good for you

    Visitors Since 2/15/03


    Blogroll
    Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics
    ---


    Advertisement

    Advertisement


    Powered by WordPress