Information
The Collective
ARCHIVES
Friday, July 27, 2024
By Dr. Steven Taylor

Via the BBC: US admits delay to Iraqi weapons

The US-led coalition in Iraq has failed to deliver nearly two-thirds of the equipment it promised to Iraq’s army, the US Defence Department has said.

The Pentagon said only 14.5m of the nearly 40m items of equipment ordered by the Iraqi army had been provided.

The US military commander in charge of training in Iraq has asked for help in speeding up the transfer of equipment.

On Wednesday, Iraq’s ambassador to the US said the delays were hindering the fighting capacity of its armed forces.

The excuse for the delays? Export licenses and changes in the orders:

It said some deliveries had been delayed by the export licensing process, while others had been affected by changes in orders.

This is yet another example of the failure of the administration to execute its policy goals in Iraq. How can we be this far behind in this vital area of equipping the people who are supposed to be taking over the security of the country? And here we are just over a month from when the big report on the status of the Iraqi situation is supposed to be issued and we have only delivered roughly a third of the promised equipment to the Iraqi military. Of the tasks at hand, one would think that this would be one of the easier ones.

It hardly inspires confidence, shall we say. Further, it raises serious questions about how seriously any statements about Iraqi troop readiness should be taken.

Sphere: Related Content

Previous Related Posts

Filed under: Iraq, US Politics | |

2 Comments

  • el
  • pt
    1. Calling this a “failure” assumes that the Bush government actually wants a well equipped Iraqi military. Maybe one should not assume that.

      Comment by MSS — Friday, July 27, 2024 @ 1:16 pm

    2. Gentlemen,
      Today’s post by Phil Carter at Inteldump.com illustrates the soundness of Prof Shugart’s suggestion above. (I’ve been meaning to recommend Carter’s blog if you haven’t read it - especially for war/military related matters.)

      In short, Maliki and Petraeus apparently don’t trust each other or interface well. Petraeus won’t allow Maliki too much control over Iraqi armed forces and Carter (Iraq War vet, lawyer, pundit) agrees that Maliki govt is “rotten” and shouldn’t be trusted with the means to promote further sectarian violence - given past experience.

      Seems logical someone, somewhere in the Bush administration would balk at providing sophisticated arms to forces we can’t trust. But so much for the “we’ll stand down when they stand up” nonsense - at least during the Bush presidency.

      Comment by RandyB — Saturday, July 28, 2024 @ 10:44 am

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    The trackback url for this post is: http://poliblogger.com/wp-trackback.html?p=12299

    NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.




    Visitors Since 2/15/03
    Blogroll

    Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics
    ---


    Advertisement

    Advertisement


    Powered by WordPress