Look Who's Linking to PoliBlog:
Absinthe and Cookies
Accidental Verbosity
Admiral Quixote's Roundtable
All Day Permanent Red
All Things Jennifer
Ann Althouse
The American Mind
Arguing with signposts
Arms and influence
The Astute Blogger
Asymmeterical Information
B-Town Blog Boys
Backcountry Conservative
Balloon Juice
Bananas and Such Begging to Differ
The Bemusement Park
Bewtween the Coasts
Betsy's Page
The Big Picture
Blogs for Bush
The Blog of Daniel Sale
Boots and Sabers
The Bully Pulpit
Cadillac Tight
Caffeinated Musing
California Yankee
Captain's Quarters
Chicago Report
Chicagoland of Confusion
Citizen Smash
Collected Thoughts
The Command Post
Common Sense and Wonder
Confessions Of A Political Junkie
The Conservative Philosopher
Conservative Revolution
Conservative and Right
Cranial Cavity
The Daily Lemon
Daly Thoughts
DANEgerus Weblog
Dart Frog on a Cactus
Dean's World Dear Free World
Brad DeLong
Democracy Project
The Disagreeable Conservative Curmudgeon
Down to the Piraeus
Drink this...
Earl's log
Earthly Passions
The Education Wonks
the evangelical outpost
Eye of the Storm
Firepower Forward
The Flying Space Monkey Chronicles
The Friendly Ghost
Fruits and Votes
Functional, if not decorative
The Galvin Opinion
The Glittering Eye
Haight Speech
The Hedgehog Report
Heh. Indeed.
Hennessy's View
High Desert Skeptic
The Hillary Project
History and Perceptions
Robert Holcomb
I love Jet Noise
Idlewild South
Independent Thinker
Insults Unpunished
Internet Ronin
Ipse Dixit
It Can't Rain All The Time...
The Jay Blog
Jen Speaks
Joefish's Freshwater Blog
John Lemon blog
Judicious Asininity
Jump In, The Water's Fine!
Just On The Other Side
A Knight's Blog
The Kudzu Files
Let's Try Freedom
Liberty Father
Life and Law
David Limbaugh
Locke, or Demosthenes?
Mad Minerva
Gary Manca
Mark the Pundit
Mediocre but Unexciting
Mental Hiccups
Miller's Time
Mind of Mog
Minorities For Bush
Mr. Hawaii
The Moderate Voice
The Modulator
Much Ado
Mungowitz End
My opinion counts
my thoughts, without the penny charge
My Word
Neophyte Pundit
Neutiquam erro
New England Republican
NewsHawk Daily
neWs Round-Up
No Pundit Intended
Nobody asked me, but...
Obsidian Wings
Occam's Toothbrush
On the Fritz
On the Third Hand
One Fine Jay
Out of Context
Outside the Beltway
Suman Palit
Passionate America
Brian Patton
Peppermint Patty
John Pierce
The Politicker
The Politburo Diktat
Political Annotation
Political Blog For The Politically Incorrect
Power Politics
Practical Penumbra
Priorities & Frivolities
Prof. Blogger's Pontifications
Pros and Cons
protein wisdom
Pundit Heads
The Queen of All Evil
Quotes, Thoughts, and other Ramblings
Ramblings' Journal
Random Acts of Kindness
Random Nuclear Strikes
Ranting Rationalist
Read My Lips
Reagan Country
Red State Diaries
A Republican's Blog
The Review
Rhett Write
Right Side of the Rainbow
Right Wingin-It
Right Wing News
Right Voices
Rightward Reasonings
riting on the wall
Rooftop Report
The Sake of Argument
Sailor in the Desert
Secular Sermons
Sha Ka Ree
Shaking Spears
She Who Will Be Obeyed!
The Skeptician
The Skewed
Slobokan's Site O' Schtuff
small dead animals
Sneakeasy's Joint
SoCal Law Blog
A Solo Dialogue
Some Great Reward
Southern Musings
Speed of Thought...
Spin Killer
Matthew J. Stinson
A Stitch in Haste
Stop the ACLU
The Strange Political Road Trip of Jane Q. Public
The Strata-Sphere
Stuff about
Suman Palit
Target Centermass
Templar Pundit
The Temporal Globe
Tex the Pontificator
Texas Native
think about it...
Tobacco Road Fogey
Toner Mishap
Tony Talks Tech
The Trimblog
Truth. Quante-fied.
Twenty First Century Republican
Unlocked Wordhoard
Use The Forks!!
Ut Humiliter Opinor
Vista On Current Events
Vox Baby
Jeff Vreeland's Blog
Wall of Sleep
Weapons of Mass Discussion
Who Knew?
The Window Manager
Winning Again!
WizBang Tech
The World Around You
The Yin Blog
You Big Mouth, You!
Non-Blogs Linking to PoliBlog:
The Blogging Political Scientists Census-Beta Version can be found here.
Friday, December 3, 2023
When is Robert Byrd Going to Retire?
By Dr. Steven Taylor @ 9:02 am

Via Chris Lawrence at Signifying Nothing, we learn of the following in the Chronicle of Higher Education:
Colleges Would Be Required to Teach the Constitution, Under Provision Tucked Into Spending Bill

Sen. Robert C. Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat and the Senate’s unofficial constitutional scholar, has inserted language into the final $388-billion spending bill for 2023 requiring that any educational institution that receives federal aid offer its students an instructional program on the U.S. Constitution each September 17, the anniversary of its signing.

While radically less onerous than the attempt by an Alabama state legislator to try and control (among other things) the books in university libraries, it is of the same category of behavior: the abuse of the budegtary process to micro-manage the activities of public institutions.

When one considers that only 8% of the funding for K-12 comes from the federal budget, one wonders why they should have control over curriculum. One guesses that the percentage of funding to colleges and universities is smaller than that. (Not that greater funding levels should lead to curriculum control). However, the situation certainly underscores the problem with Congress acquiring policy control via fiscal policy rather than via constitutional authority (and there is no constitutional power for Congress to regulate education in the US).

And while I can hardly argue with the following, mandating an annual day to study the Constitution isn’t going to solve anything:

In a written statement, Senator Byrd said Americans need to better understand the Constitution and its importance. “We can build upon the respect and reverence we still hold for our Constitution,” the senator said. “But we had better start now, before, through ignorance and apathy, even that much slips away from us.”

Not to mention that odds are good that the vast majority of faculty in K-12 (and, for that matter, in higher ed) aren’t qualified to provide such instruction.

And I agree with Chris:

Perhaps we political scientists (who, doubtless, will be the individuals subject to this unfunded mandate) should also devote another day—say, December 3—to teaching about the practice of including non-germane provisions in conference reports, thus circumventing the committee system and the rest of the ordinary legislative process.


At any rate: any students wishing to learn more about the Constitution feel free to take my American National Government course. More specifically, the honors version of the course is designed specifically around that document, so come on down.

Filed under: US Politics, Academia | |Send TrackBack

Hennessy's View linked with Monday Morning QB
Confessions Of A Political Junkie linked with Mark this date down
Outside The Beltway linked with Byrd Requires Colleges Teach Constitution


  • el
  • pt
    1. I’d invite students to take my Intro to American Government course in the spring, but it’s overbooked as is. That said, there’s still seats in the room, so I might yet be convinced to sign an “add” slip or two.

      BTW, how big’s your honors class?

      Comment by Chris Lawrence — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 9:21 am

    2. Byrd Requires Colleges Teach Constitution
      Colleges Would Be Required to Teach the Constitution, Under Provision Tucked Into Spending Bill (Chronicle of Higher Education)

      Sen. Robert C. Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat and the Senate’s unofficial constitutional scholar, has inserted language …

      Trackback by Outside The Beltway — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 9:22 am

    3. The main sections run 45-50.

      The honors class was a shade under 20 this semester (it is an annual class in the Fall)

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 9:26 am

    4. 45-50? Not so bad. (In fact, my smallest Am Govt class before Millsaps was 70; here, I’m considered to be overworked relative to other departments with just 27.)

      Comment by Chris Lawrence — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 10:40 am

    5. As it stands there are almost no rooms on campus that accomodate more than 50 (and not all of the sections hit the max anyway). They are, however, building a new building that will have four classrooms with large (100ish, I am thinking) capacities.

      We shall see how things develop from there.

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 10:49 am

    6. Thanks to Sen. Byrd I now have an even better example of ways around how a bill becomes a law than some I pulled in the Florida Legislature.

      Course a Poli Sci degree and 8 years in State and Federal Legislature and I am not sure I am qualified to teach the Constitution.

      Comment by Rob M — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 3:44 pm

    7. This doesn’t (and shouldn’t) bother me. Money comes with strings attached. So what? You want to take the Uncle’s money, you play by the Uncle’s rules.

      Comment by Trump — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 5:06 pm

    8. Perhaps.

      But, of course, by that logic, Byrd should have a hand in desiging the fighter jets the Congress pays for and the bridges on interstate highways.

      Legislatures ought to be setting broad policy goals and then hiring experts to execute them.

      Micro-managing policy isn’t the Congress’ job.

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 5:13 pm

    9. Not to mention that if he thinks this is a worthwhile endeavor, he shouldn’t hide it in an appropriations bill, he should introduce it and have the Congress debate it.

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Friday, December 3, 2023 @ 7:28 pm

    10. Mark this date down
      It is a strange day in the annals when I agree with Robert Byrd and disagree with Betsy Newmark. Besty posts: Steven Taylor blogs about something that Robert Byrd is slipping into the budget resolution to require schools that receive federal money to d…

      Trackback by Confessions Of A Political Junkie — Saturday, December 4, 2023 @ 5:13 pm

    11. Monday Morning QB
      <P>No, it’s not about football.&nbsp; </P> <P>1.&nbsp; Howard Dean isn’t an…

      Trackback by Hennessy's View — Sunday, December 5, 2023 @ 8:13 am

    12. OOH yes. teaching the constitution is fraught with danger! I heard the people who wrote it were revolutionaries and radicals. Many were BAD UNCHRISTIAN PEOPLE. DEISTS and worse!

      Better we should have legislation to teach the BIBLE!

      Comment by frodo — Friday, December 17, 2023 @ 5:34 pm

    13. Methinks thou dost miss the point.

      I teach the Constitution all the time–that isn’t the issue.

      The issue is whether Senators ought to be sneaking in curriculum design into omnibus bills.

      Further: perhaps someone ought to teach Senator Byrd the Constitution–it isn’t the role of congress in Article II to make educationsl policy.

      Comment by Steven Taylor — Friday, December 17, 2023 @ 5:43 pm

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    The trackback url for this post is:

    NOTE: I will delete any TrackBacks that do not actually link and refer to this post.

    Leave a comment


    Visitors Since 2/15/03

    PoliBlog is the Host site for:

    A TTLB Community

    Powered by WordPress